17 Comments

Preserving objective language and knowledge is by far the most important issue.

Democrats on one hand, we will protect women's rights 😉

Other hand .. whichamacallic = woman = thingamajig

Expand full comment

I basically agree with this point, but the madness on the left is largely just the messiness of cultural progress in action. At one point everyone thought gay marriage was an outlandish proposition. Then the far left made it mainstream and now we all agree it's chill. At this moment, I would that argue that gender ideology has gone off the rails and it's obviously absurd that leftists can't say what a woman is (an adult human female). And likewise the idea that we should abolish the police is going too far. Etc. But we only know these things are going too far because leftists forced us to have the conversation as a culture, and every sane person agrees it's going too far.

On the other hand, the crazy conspiratorial madness coming out of the right is entirely unhelpful. It does nothing for cultural progress and only serves to make a circus out of the political discourse.

Expand full comment

He’s a loser and a pathetic bully and that’s really the sum total of his legacy: nothing of merit

Expand full comment

I 100% disagree that the "madness on the left is largely just the messiness of cultural progress in action."

That's 100% wrong. The fact that "progress" and "left" are still used together reminds me of "big brothers truth ministry."

The Left is garbage bc of their immoral principles. Socialism is nothing more than group slavery. Slavery goes against human nature, so chaos always follows it as humans try to break free.

Emotionalism addict is the mind of a slaver and millions being murdered is what your always going to get with group slavery (1900's).

The far left isn't the reason for gay marriage. It's loud but it's loud about everything.

Gender ideology and no police are totally insane positions and the left being for them, is just more examples of how insane group slavers are

Expand full comment

Cultural progress is driven by people who are liberal--i.e. people who have high openness to experience and have a low disgust response. I don't think this is disputed by anyone. Some portion of people who are liberal by temperament will also be crazy or just lack life experience. Those are the people who take liberal ideas too far.

And yes people who drove the gay rights movement was driven by the radical left. The normie liberal (Obama, Hillary, etc.) was staunchly opposed to it till the last moment.

Expand full comment

Like I said, the far left was just most vocal but they were not the only ones who were pro LGB. There's pro-LGB people outside of communists. And I would argue that the rights that the far left stand for are anti-LBG because communists are pro-LGBT which means they package gay in with mental illness people. The "Tijfepedo+" plus community does more harm to gay men than anyone else. Most of the boys and men who end up believing they are women are just gay guys. Communist are "trans-pro LGB rights."

You do not have to be liberal to make progress. It seems you fell for the Democrats word game of simply identifying as progressive.

To make progress you have to understand reality more in-depth so that you improve knowledge and technology. The Left is fighting to destroy objective knowledge, language, words, etc. Which means they are fighting progress. They are fighting for censorship and blasphemy laws for their delusional fantasy trans delusional religion.

Expand full comment

Do you know anyone on the far left? I feel like you have a caricatured idea of them. When I lived in Oakland, Berkeley, and San Francisco I knew a ton. None of them are communists or even socialists. They're rich kids who want to have a positive impact in the world but since most real problems have already been solved, they're making up new ones to make themselves feel good. The vast, vast majority of these people grow out of this far-left wannabe-dogooder mindset as soon as they turn thirty, have kids, and move to the suburbs.

Expand full comment

The far left is communism. Far left is government control of everything. If you are far left, you might not identify as a communist but you have the same immoral mindset and goals. Functionally your a communist. Feelings and desires don't change what a person is functionally.

Everyone wants to have a positive impact on the world. Serial murderers believe they are good people doing good work, the vast majority of them at least. Having a desire does not make someone moral in anyway. The metaphorical road to hell is paved with emotionalist who have "positive desires."

People who are far left have completely immoral values and desires, bc they value and desire group slavery to the "mad mob." There's a reason why far left ideology murdered 100 million plus people in the 1900's alone.

All problems are not pretty much solved at all. There's a ton of problems to solve.

Emotionally delusional and immoral people inventing new problems is a strike against them. It points out how completely irrational their minds are. It points out one reason that far left leads to mass murder, bc delusional people do delusional things, especially when they have power. It shows how far left eats itself, so anything slightly good it might try to do will always end up destroyed.

One of the fundamental laws of morality is "Irrationality always leads to immorality." Far left is Marxist slavers.

Expand full comment

This is incredibly simplistic and simply not true. Communism is only one form of being on the far left. Wanting the politics of a Scandinavian country is considered far left. And Scandinavian countries are incredibly far from being anything near Communist. And those countries have not gotten nearly as crazy around gender stuff as us and many Scandinavian countries are way more into border security than the American left.

Again, almost no one in America is actually Communist. I'd be willing to bet there are more far leftists who are anarchists than there are far leftists who are Communist. This is Chomsky, for example. And basically every leftist undergrad reads Chomsky at some point.

Expand full comment

You are welcome to your beliefs but your beliefs are wrong. Your desire to complicate things is the problem, bc your not complicating things with your frontal lobe, your primal brain is complicating it which is why you've contradicted yourself multiple times.

1. There is definitely real communist in America. You have a desire for there not to be but there definitely is and there are many who openly identify that way... That's just a completely false and nonsense statement.

2. Far left is socialism at an absolute minimum, but mostly just straight up marxism/communism... You believe someone can be far left and not a communist or socialist, but that is completely wrong.

3. You are defending the far left while throwing it completely under the bus... You say that a lot of far leftists are just rich kids inventing problems bc they delusionally believe most problems are solved, but they grow out of it after having a family and beginning to live in the real world, effectively....ur defending it while admitting to understanding how retarded it is? This doesn't make any sense at all.

4. Scandinavian countries are not far left. This is another emotional belief that group slavers tell themselves (socialist/communist). Far left hates free markets and Scandinavian countries do not hate free markets at all. They have more economic freedom than America in many many ways.... Scandinavians went through some really tough times in the 70's/80's and found out how immoral it is to centralize the economy.

It seems to me, like your trying to emotionalize to yourself your decision to give power to the people who claim to care about "whichamacallic rights.".... They don't at all, bc group slavers only care about power and control. They lie to themselves about why they want it and they lie to everyone else about why they want it.

Expand full comment

Ditto to the other major political party candidate funning in the race.

Expand full comment